![]() Case was one of first impression concerning the impact of a plaintiff’s request for coordination of actions under California’s coordination statutes. 2014) (en banc), in which the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, reversed an order of remand following removal under the mass action provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., 771 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. Represented Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.Bush, Los Angeles Superior Court Appellate Division No. See The Rector, Wardens, and Vestrymen of St. In matter of first impression regarding interpretation of the California Corporation Code’s procedure for voting by ballot in a religious non-profit corporation, obtained reversal on appeal of trial court’s decision regarding who had legal claim to possession of historic church.Obtained defense judgment after trial on behalf of client against construction defect/alter-ego claims in excess of $10 million.°.Obtained dismissal at the pleading stage of a securities fraud mass action against one of the world’s largest real estate investment firms involving tenant-in-common investments in commercial property.Obtained dismissal at the pleading stage of claims brought against one of the world’s largest private banks alleging wrongdoing in connection with foreclosure on an estate property.Successfully defended project approvals against CEQA claims relating to a 1.8 million square foot warehouse distribution and logistics center in the County of Riverside.Just prior to the Final Status Conference leading up to trial, obtained $6.5 million settlement from the State (on top of more than $29 million previously obtained from the State on behalf of the client at a prior stage of the same litigation). Represented scrap metal business in eminent domain proceedings concerning property taken by the State of California in connection with the I-5 corridor widening project in Los Angeles County.Marina Pacifica Homeowners Association Southern California Financial Corp., 11 Cal. Obtained affirmance of the final judgment in developer’s favor, after the homeowner’s association appealed again after lobbying the Legislature to change the law. Southern California Financial Corporation, 232 Cal. See Marina Pacifica Homeowners Association v. Also handled appeal and defense of cross-appeal, with an appellate decision resulting in a substantially larger and eight-figure judgment in developer’s favor. ![]() After three-week trial, defeated claims for disgorgement of past fees paid and to reduce fee to zero or a nominal fee going forward (rather than a fee pursuant to the contractual formula), resulting in seven-figure judgment in developer’s favor. Represented developer of luxury waterfront condominium complex in Long Beach, California against claims brought by homeowner’s association, on behalf of condominium owners, to challenge monthly compensation owed to developer from inception of complex through 2041.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |